Loading...
0961.j RESOLUTION NO. MEMORANDUM OF INTENT This MEMORANDUM OF INTENT is between the City of West Memphis, Arkansas, party of the first part (hereinafter re- ferred to as the "City"), and Langston Companies, Inc., a Tennessee corporation, party of the second party (hereinafter ~ referred to as the "Borrower"). IN CONSIDERATION of the undertakings of the parties set forth herein and the benefits to be derived therefrom and of other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by the parties, the City and the Borrower AGREE: 1. Preliminary Statement. (a) The City is a duly exist- ing municipality under the laws of the State of Arkansas and is authorized by the laws of the State of Arkansas, including particularly Act Igo. 9 of the First Extraordinary Session of the Sixty-Second General Assembly of the State of Arkansas, approved January 21, 1960, as amended ("Act 9"), to issue revenue bonds for financing the costs of acquiring, construc- tion and equipping industrial facilities (as defined in and authorized by Act 9) and to lease and/or sell the same for such rentals and payments and upon such terms and conditions as the City deeds advisable. (b) The Borrower (or one of its affiliates) proposes to acquire and install a printing press and other equipment, and e construct and equip warehouse, manufacturing and office space, thereby improving and expanding its present multiwall paper bag manufacturing facility (the "Industrial Facilities") located ;~ in the City, and has requested a commitment from the City that it issue industrial development bonds and make the proceeds available for the financing of all or part of the costs and expenses incurred in constructing and equipping the Industrial Facilities. (c) The City is willing to so commit and to proceed with the issuance of such bonds as and when requested by the Borrower. (d) the City considers that the improving, expanding and equipping of the Industrial Facilities by the Borrower will secure and develop industry and thereby promote the general health and economic welfare of the inhabitants of the City and adjacent areas. -2- (e) The obligations set forth in this Memorandum of Intent shall apply both to the Borrower and to any assignee permitted hereby. 2. Undertakings on the Part of the City. Subject to the conditions above stated, the City agrees as follows: (a) That when requested by the Borrower, it will authorize and take, or cause to be taken, the necessary steps to issue bonds under Act 9, in the aggregate principal amount necessary to furnish the financing of all or any part of the costs of accomplishing the improvements, expansion and equipping of the Industrial Facilities. In this regard, it is estimated at this time that the cost of improving, expanding and equipping the Industrial Facilities as proposed will not exceed $1,400,000. Thus, Industrial Development Revenue Bonds will be issued under Act 9 in such amounts as shall be requested by the Borrower for accomplishing all or any part of the proposed changes to the Industrial Facilities (the "Bonds"). (b) That it will, if requested by the Borrower, at the proper time and subject in all respects to the recommendation and approval of the Borrower, have the Bonds underwritten and will adopt, or cause to be adopted, such proceedings and authorize the execution of such documents as may be necessary and advisable for the authorization, sale, and issuance of the Bonds, and improving, expanding and equipping of the Industrial Facilities, the loan of the proceeds of the Bonds to the Bor- rower for that purpose or the leasing or sale of the Industrial Facilities to the Borrower (it being understood that the form of the transaction will be subsequently determined), all in ~; conformity with Act 9 and any other applicable federal and {; state laws and upon terms and conditions mutually satisfactory to the City and the Borrower. (c) That the aggregate basic rents or payments (i.e., the rents or payments to be used to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds) payable under the lease, loan agreement or sale agreement (whichever is applicable) be- tween the City and the Borrower, shall be sufficient to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds when due. The lease, loan agreement, sale agreement or other appropriate agreement (whichever is applicable) shall contain such provisions as are necessary or desirable, consistent with the authority conferred by Act 9. (d) That it will take or cause to be taken such other acts and adopt such further proceedings as may be required to implement the aforesaid undertakings or as it may deem appro- priate in pursuance thereof. ~~ -3- 3. Undertakings on the Part of the Borrower. Subject to the conditions above stated, the Borrower agrees as follows: (a) That it will cooperate with the City in the sale and issuance of the Bonds to the end of achieving timely and favor- able marketing thereof. (b) That it will enter into such lease, loan agreement, sale agreement or other appropriate agreements with the City, as the Borrower and the City determine to use, under which the Borrower will obligate itself to pay to the city rents or payments sufficient to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds when due and containing such other provisions as are necessary or desirable consistent with the authority conferred by Act 9. (c) That it will take such further action and adopt such further proceedings as may be required to implement its afore- said undertakings or as it may deem appropriate in pursuance thereof. (d) That it will, if necessary, make payments in lieu of ad valorem taxes for distribution to the ad valorem taxing authorities on all facilities financed by the Bonds. In this regard, an appropriate agreement or agreements covering the detail of the payment will be entered into and delivered at or before the closing of the Bond issue. 4. General Provisions. (a) This Memorandum of Intent shall continue in full force and effect until. the improvements to and expansion and equipping of the Industrial Facilities and their financing by Bonds, as herein specified, is ac- complished, and in this regard it is understood that there may be separate issues of Bonds and separate series within a particular issue, with different maturities, interest rates, redemption provisions and other details. In the case of each issue, and of each series, the City will take appropriate action by ordinance or resolution to sell and authorize the Bonds and to authorize and execute such agreements and docu- ments as may be determined necessary or desirable by the City and the Borrower. ", R ,' ~ -4- ~.r IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Memorandum of In~,e~i~/ by their off c~ thereunto d ly authorized as of the -/ /~ day of 84. CITY OF ST ME P S ATTEST: Ci y Cle (Seal) ATTEST: By: (Se LANGSTON COMPANIE By: Its ~~ PAI~~NELL KERR FORSTER Certified Public Accountants 5100 Poplar Avenue Memphis, TN 38137 Telephone (901) 761-1840 Cable PANKERR MEMPHIS The Board of Directors Langston Companies, Inc. Memphis, Tennessee ~'e have examined the consolidated balance sheets of Langston. Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries at November 26, 1982 and November 27, 1981 and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and changes in financial position for the fifty-two weeks then ended. Our examinations were .:a de in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and, accordingly, included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessa_y in the circumstances. In our opinion, the consolidated financial s*_atements referred to above present fairly the financial position of Langston Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries at ":ove.:;ber 26, 1°82 and November 27, 1981, and the results of their operations and the chan>;es i_n their financial position for the fifty-two weeks then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis. ~~ ~~ ".ay 12, 1983 LA.~IGSTON COMPAIVyE Consolida 7 Assets Current asse*_s Cash Receivables Notes and accounts receivable - trade Notes and accounts receivable from affiliates (note 2) Less allowance for doubtful accounts Inventories (note 1) Finished goods t"'ork in process Ra:~ materials Prepaid inco;r.e taxes Prepaid expenses Total current assets Property, plant and equipment (note 1) Land Buildings Leasehold improvements Machinery and plant equipment Machinery under capital lease (note 3) Furniture and office equipment Less accumulated depreciation and amortization , Other assets and deferred charges Investments (at cost) Cash value of life insurance net of policy loans of $17,600 in 1982 and Ltnamortized debt expense $13'750 in 1981 Memberships (note 1) Insurance and other deposits Sundry November 26 1982 $ 2,508,816 2,928,198 121, 505 3,049,703 2 7, 700 3,G22,003 305,6 79 76,772 1,644,764 2,027,215 3,387 20 , 34 9 7,581,770 177,625 633,027 14,309 2,978,836 175,450 3,979,247 2,637,349 1,341,898 84,547 206 , 2 73 25,336 7,694 19,595 12,176 35,6 2i November 27 1981 $ 913, 726 2, 55'? , 530 735,118 3, 287,648 28,200 3,259,448 316 , 7 78 103,565 1,774,917 2,195,260 14,887 11,747 6,395,068 177,625 633,027 16,147 2,450,415 385, 335 174,379 3,836,928 2,302,618 1,534,310 84,547 179, 386 28,075 7,694 46,671 18,868 3b 5,241 See notes to consolidated f $ 9,279,289 $ 8,294,619 financial statements ~~ES , Eq,,ity ~UggIB and StOGkholdets Sheets Liabilities met 26 ~°~ 99x2 Cnote 3~ term debt ttent lia ~t rii les t a oe Cu Cuxtent savable ns3tion Acc k overdra llitios d other co~^P 9es Ban sued liab wades an and other Acc p9o~e ty~~ paY~°ll on Cnote 5~ pthet st conttibuti Zntete .shax ing s toy it Glai9 Y n s`l~ anc e s Z s 4ay'able comae tare ~i de al and State nt liab illties Ee Total cutre rent ~tu~ities ~tetm debt less cu Long 25 app 9 $ 1~5a,439 ~ove~e~c 2l 19g1 6p,p29 $ 1 345,563 1a5,~42 4a .6a1 1 ,56a 4 ,4p1 35 +ppp /p~,~i 9 3~ 0 39,pa1 2 ,41~ '99p 246,62 31 ~3~ 5 3 5+ 935 3p ,ppp 34a ,lip x2,921 X6,629 l,a~ gll ,ppp Cn°te 3~ Cnote 4) Co~it~ents it9 value ; issued to°kY'olde st°~ 0.u $ pp , pp Sha ses ses p 5 ~,a S p°~ hot `Z ta~d~g ~ ~ a cap 1ta1 d °~ as ont=ibu Add ate ~ea~ cgs Re 2g2,ppp 219, g9 0 2~ 9 , g94 5 ~g60 ,6p 140,9 6,29'9 g9 6~ 6, ~ 6,29`', S 9'2,9 ~2ag 4 LANGSTOh' COMP~~NIES, INC. A,ti'D SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Income Fifty-two weeks ended November 26 November 27 1982 1981 Net sales $ 21,821,587 $ 25,393,967 Costs and expenses Cost of goods sold Opera*_ing expenses 19,6 53,206 22,926,181 1,668,854 1,928 362 21,322,060 , 24,854,543 Operating income Other income (deductions) net 499,527 539,424 280,64 195,142 Income before income taxes Income taxes (note 6) 780,391 734,566 341,048 308,485 Net income $ 439,343 S 426,081 See notes to con solidated financial statements 6 LANGSTON C0:1.-ANIES, INC. AID SliBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Changes in Financial Position Fifty-Two weeks ended November 26 _ Novembez 27 1982 1981 Sources of working capital Operations Net income $ 439,343 $ 426,081 Add items not affecting working capital Depreciation and amortization property slant and equipment 432,259 463,546 Amortization of debt expense 2 739 2 739 Funds provided from operations 874,341 892,366 Disposal of property, plant and equipment 11,711 14,695 Decrease in other assets 6,881 - Total sources of working capital 892,933 907,061 Applications of working capital Current maturities and repayments of long-term debt 25,000 59,946 additions to property, plant and equipment 251,558 219,933 Dividends paid 11,040 _ Increase in other assets - 75,454 Total applications of working capital 287,598 355,333 Net increase in working capital 605 335 551 728 Forking capital, beginning of year 4,558,445 , 4,006,717 horking capital, end of year $ 5,163,7$0 $ 4,558,445 Increase (decrease) in working capital by coLponents Cash $ 1,595,090 $ 78 489 Receivables (237,445) , 886,851 Inventories (168,045) (400 554) Refundable income taxes - , ( 70,800) Prepaid income taxes ( 11,500) ( 94,537} Prepaid expenses 8,602 5,536 Current maturities of long-term debt 35 029 8,267 Accounts payable - trade (152,748) 183,142 Eank overdraft (544,439) _ Accrued liabilities 47,991 11,334 Dividends payable ( 11,040) _ Federal and state income taxes 43,840 (56,000) Net increase in working capital $ 605,335 $ 551.728 See notes to consolidated financial statements 7 LA.NGSTOr CO?•~A2~IES, IrC. AND SL~SIDIARIES tiotes to Consolidated Financial Statements tiovember 26, 1982 and November 27, 1981 ?rote 1 - Su:..ary of sibr.ificant accounting policies Frinciples of consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the parent company and all wholly- owned subsidiaries. All *naterial intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Inventories Appro~:imateiy 64~ and 61°'- of the 1982 and 1981 inventories, respectively, are valued at cost on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method or market, whichever is lower. The remain-i.ng inventories, $730,057 and $852,858 at November 26, 1982 and '~ovember 27, 1981, respectively, are valued at cost on the last-in, first- out (LIFO) method, which cost is lower than current replacement market. Frcpert}•, plan*_ and equipment Frooer*_v, plant and equipment is stated at cost. Additions, renewals and better- ~ents that a~~ materially to productive capacity or extend the life of an asset are capitalized. E~:perditures for maintena^.ce and repairs which do not extend the life of the applicable assets are charged to expense as incurred. L'pon retire- ment or disposal of an asset, the asset and accumulated depreciation accounts - are adusted accordingl~•. Any resulting gain or loss is included in income. Depreciation is provided for in amounts sufficient to relate the cost of depre- ciable assets to operations using the straight-line and declining balance methods of depreciation over their estimated useful lives as follows: Buildings 10-25 years *iachinery and equipment 3-10 years Office furniture and equipment 3-10 years Leasehold iWarovements are amortized over the life of the lease. Allowance for doubtful accounts The company provides for uncollectible receivables by applying established percent- ages to the balance of customers' accounts aged according to the degree of delinquency:. Debt expense The cost of debt financing is capitalized and amortized to operations over the life of the debt using the straight-line method. 8. LA_'~GSTON COMPANIES, INC. AIv~ SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) November 26, 1982 and November 27, 1981 - Note 2 - Related party transactions "' Two stockholders own controlling interests in other organizations which are - customers of the co^pany. All sales to such organizations were made in the ordi_*~ary ccurse of the coTpany's business at its regularly established prices. Amounts due from affiliates at the balance sheet dates are as follows: November 26 November 27 198 2 1981 Hi-Te}: Fagging Co. $ 121,043 $ 734,194 r Langston Enterprises, Inc. 452 924 S J_21,~05 S 73`,118 Note 3 - Long-term debt P.s of Nove:,~~er 26, 1982 and November 27, 1981, long-tern debt consisted of the following: w 1982 1981 -- Note payable bank-trustee $ 317,000 $ 340,000 Capitalized lease obligation - 37,029 ~` 317,000 377,029 ,, Less, current maturities 25,000 60,029 Long-term debt ~ 292,000 S 317,000 The company entered into a refinancing loan agreement in March, 1972, with the First Tennessee Bank N.A. Memphis as Trustee for the City of West Memphis, Arkansas. y The proceeds were used to retire existing debt and for the construction of a plant in West Memphis, Arkansas, along with the purchase of related machinery. .• The plant and equipment Have been capitalized by the company and are pledged as collateral on this note. The company leases the plant and equipment at an average annual amount of $41,707 which is sufficient to pay the principal and interest expense on the debt. Interest is payable semi-annually at rates ranging from 4-1/4% to 6%. The initial term of the lease is twenty years with options to renew for an additional thirty years at a nominal charge. Under the covenants of the refinancing agreement Langston Companies, Inc. may not pay dividends in excess of $25,000 for any fiscal year, nor will the company be permitted *_o redeem any shares of stock outstanding that are owned by the .. Langston family, their successors or assigns. ~' _._, L.4.`~GSTON CO'~A.h'IES, INC. AND SLBSIDIA.RIES J Notes to Consolidated Fin ancial Statements (continued) November 26, 1982 and November 27, 1981 J __, In 1982 the company purchased certain machinery from First Tennessee Leasing Corporation. This machinery had been leased from the lessor under an agreement which expired in 1982. ', In 1981, the equipment was classified as equipment under capital lease. In 1982, ,r the equipment is classified as machinery and equipment at the original amount capitalized. Note 4 - Commitments -- The company leases executive and administrative offices and warehouse space under noncancellable operating leases expiring at various dates through 1984. The ~ leases provida for payment of tax increases and certain other expenses by the lessee. The mi;:imum rental commitments wader these operating leases are as follows: 1983 $ 61,532 1984 9,008 -~ Total S 70_s540 9 Total rent expense for the periods ended November 26, 1982 and November 27, 1981 _ was $506,905 and $601,697, respectively, including truck rental on a month-to- month basis of $410,798 in 1982 and $499,071 in 1981. ,. Note 5 - Profit sharing and thrift plans The company has a qualified profit-sharing plan for the benefit of salaried employees. The plan provides for a minimum annual contribution based on company earnings in excess of $25,000, but the board of directors has authority to increase ,r this to any amount not in excess of that allowable as a deduction for federal income tax purposes. The contributions to the plan were $35,000 and $30,000 for the periods ended November 26, 1982 and November 27, 1981, respectively. The company makes annual contributions to the plan equal to the amount accrued r as profit sharing contribution. The company also has a thrift savings plan for full-time hourly employees. The employee may contribute one to ten percent of his annual compensation and the company will contribute an amount equal to 50% of the contribution made by the employee. The company's contributions to the plan were $3,133 and $6,509 for the periods ended November 26, 1982 and November 27, 1981, respectively. 10 LAtiGSTON CO~L°A'~IES, INC. AND SLBSIDIAFIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) November 26, 1982 and November 27, 1981 Note 6 - Federal and state income taxes The reasons for the difference between the total tax e}:p en se and the amount com- puted by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to pre-tax income for the periods ended tiover~er 26, 1982 and November 27, 1981 are as follows: 1982 1981 Federal income tax computed at the statutory rate on pre-tax income $ 339,230 $ 318,650 State income tax, net of federal tax benef it 24 ,694 20,644 Investment tax credit - net of recapture (21,070) (18,582) Jobs tax credit - net ( 4,790) (13,104} Other 2,984 877 Total federal a^d state income taxes S 341,048 S 308,485 In~~estment tax credits are accounted for by the flow-through method which recognizes the credits as reductions of income tax expense in the year utilized. ~ } a ~' 1f CERTIFICATE ~r I ~ Dan Craft West Memphis, Arkansas resolution was adopted municipality by a vote and held on FPhruarv was at all times prese City Clerk of the City of do hereby certify that the following and approved by the City Council of said of 7 to p at a meeting duly called ~6~ 1984, at which a quorum nt. "RESOLVED, that the execution, delivery and performance of a Memorandum of Intent in the form presented to this meeting, providing, among other things, for the issuance by this City of revenue bonds for financing the cost of, acquisition and installation of a printing press and other equipment, and construction and equipping of ware- house, manufacturing and office space, thereby improving and expanding a multiwall paper bag manufacturing facility in or near this City which facility will be operated by Langston Companies, Inc., a Tennessee corporation, or any of its affiliates, is hereby authorized, ratified, con- firmed and approved." r ~ . ~ I3or+~d h~iujc~ns P.O. Box 3783 Memphis. Tn. 38173 Third Floor 67 Madison Avenue Memphis, Tn. 38103 901-526-7000 Of Counsel: W.B. Rosenfield Marx J. Borod Stephen L. Anderson Martin H. Aussenberg Ronald S. Borod Lynn B. Buhler H. Phillip Carnes David J. Cocke 'James T. Cox Jeffrey C. Gerrish Steve R. Graber A. Neal Graham Daniel B. Hatzenbuehler Stanley M. Huggins Bruce S. Kramer Richard H. Kremer Ann W. Langston Brad S. Lerner David H. Lillard. Jr. Judith W. Lineback ' ' G. Thomas Love, III B. Percy Magness P. Thomas Parrish J. Richard Rossie John S. Seabold David C. Shelton Ann Watson 'licensed in Arkansas only "licensed in Kentucky only Washington Office: 503 Twenty-First St., N.W. Washington. D.C. 20036 202-785-3108 Candace Ingals licensed in District of Columbia only James Pickman licensed in District of Columbia and New York only February 13, 1984 Vice Mayor Doug Morris P.O. Box 25 West Memphis, Arkansas 72301 ' ~- ~ , Re: West Memphis Act 9 Bond Committee - Proposed Bond Issue for Langston Companies, Inc. Dear Vice Mayor Morris: As per our discussion, I am enclosing Langston Companies, Inc. describing ti ject, a proposed Memorandum of Intent requests the City Council to adopt at 1984 meeting and a copy of the latest financial statement for the company. a letter from ze proposed pro- which Langston its February 16, available audited I trust that this information will be sufficient for the Act 9 Bond Committee to grant Langston Companies, Inc. an inducement resolution. Representatives of the company as well as a representative from Borod & Huggins will be present at the meeting on February 16 to answer any questions about the propsed project. If you need any further information or documentation prior to this meeting, please contact me at your earliest convenience. Thank you for all your help and consideration in this matter. With kindest regards, Sincerely, ~~ ~ . Brad S. Lerner BSL:dr Enclosures cc: Mayor Leo Chitman ~ ~ , . ~ V r ~ ~ , LANGSTON COMPANIES, INC. 2714 Union Avenue Extended Memphis, Tennessee 38112 February 13, 1984 Vice Mayor Doug Morris P.0. Box 25 West Memphis, Arkansas 72301 Re: West Memphis Act 9 Bond Committee - Proposed Bond Issue for Langston Companies, Inc. Dear Vice Mayor Morris: Langston Companies, Inc., who presently has a manufacturing facility in West Memphis, Arkansas, plans to expand its present manufacturing facility and is requesting the City of West Memphis, Arkansas to issue its revenue bonds (under Act 9) to assist in financing the project. Langston Companies, Inc. ("Langston") proposes to construct approximately 16,000 to 20,000 square feet of additional ware- house and manufacturing space, and 1,250 square feet of additional office space to its present manufacturing facility located at 1100 North Seventh in West Memphis. In addition, Langston pro- poses to acquire and install a printing press and other equipment in that facility. This expansion of the Company's multi-wall paper bag manufacturing facility will result in the creation of approximately 15 to 20 new jobs. Langston is requesting the City of West Memphis, Arkansas to issue approximately $1,200,000 to $1,400,000 of its revenue bonds to assist in financing these expanded facilities and equipment acquisitions. Enclosed is a copy of a proposed Memo- randum of Intent which Langston requests the City Council to adopt at its February 16, 1984 meeting. Also enclosed is a copy of the latest available audited financial statement for Langston. An audited financial statement for this past year will be avail- able within the next few weeks if the City Council so requires. Please let us know if we can provide you with any furtYler information concerning Langston Companies, Inc. or its proposed West Memphis expansion. Sincerely, Langston Com~anies , '~nc . av k' ~ ~ ~~* I ~ s ~~:s cc: Mayor Leo Chitman